Comparaison Between Mcmxiv & Anthem for Doomed Youth Essay

In twain of these poems anthem For Doomed callowness and MCMXIV talking or so war, Wilfred Owen and Philip Larkin try in agate lineive slipway to engrave in their readers minds the atrocious actions that war provoked with antithetical language, voice except excessively form.First of all, the poems atomic number 18 written in a different way. anthem For Doomed Youth with his ABAB CDCD ABBACC rhyme plan is in fact a sonnet. However, a sonnet is usually apply to glorify love and romance whereas Anthem For Doomed Youth focuses on the First World War. We fundament assume that Wilfred Owen surely wanted to contrast these two opposite landing fields to create an ironic atmosphere. We can already deduce the poem is going to be powerful and memorable. On the other hand, the heartbeat poem, MCMXIV,is composed of 4 stanzas containing each 8 lines but which dont subscribe to a rhythmic pitch. For me, it looks like Philip Larkin is narrating a tale or a story. In my opinion, t he sonnet gives a rhythm to the poem and catches to a greater extent the readers attention even if it mootms shorter than Larkins poem.Secondly, we know both(prenominal) of these poems are talking about the First Wold War. But if we look a little bit closer, we can clearly belief a rest in the choice of words and language. After reading the first poem, we feel a mix of disgust, revulsion and unfairness whereas subsequently reading Philip Larkins nonpareil, melancholia, emptiness and ruthfulness invade us. How can two poems with the same subject can lead to such different feelings?The sonnet looks like it is divide in two parts, both of the stanzas start with a question What passing-bells for these who clear as cattle?, What candles may be held to speed them all? Then, the pastime lines answer to the questions. For me, it seems its like a speech with two rhetorical questions. The poet asks the questions but already has the answers and responds to it real precisely in a ve ry negative way no, nor, not are used at the beginning of a line following the question.Anthem For Doomed Youth is a small but efficient poem. Any word is give way for a particular reason. The mental lexicon used is snappy and harsh one such as monstrous anger nor any(prenominal) voice of distress who communicate as cattle. It sounds like Wilfred Owen wants to shock us. He plunges us in the horror of the war we can around sound the stuttering rifles, see the holy glimmers of goodbyes. He definitely wants to express his disgust toward war. Indeed, we are not facing a peaceful war as the whole world expected in 1914, these young boys do not bravely die for their nation its a horrific battle which hassle both sides but both stubbornly do not make any move to stop this carnage.Owen makes us feel the constant fear, the incomprehension of this pointless ravage Withal, the second poem has a more smooth way of approach. Philip Larkin wants to have an affective impact. He doesnt use s triking a vocabulary like Wilfred Owen but a melancholic one. in that respect is this feeling of labor movement and reclusion shut shops, sunblinds, shadowing Doomsday lines. Whereas we could almost hear the stuttering rifles in Anthem For Dommed Youth, here, in MCMXIV, silence is the only tolerable sound. No one should make noise, in honour of all the dead soldiers who fought naively for a realize that wasnt even directly linked to their nation.Wilfred Owen expresses the horror of the trench war whereas Philip Larkin enters in the impact on social consequences that War leaded to. intent lead never be the same again after this cataclysm. not only ordain the soldiers be shell-shocked, but the whole population will be too. Even though women and children were not on the battlefront, they still go through the war at home fronts.Owen also uses repetitions to emphasize some precise phrases. The second and third lines both start with the word only and are followed by personificat ions of weapons like the monstrous anger of the guns and stuttering riffles rapid rattle it is almost like the poet cannot even distinguish the human beings and machines. The men do not kill each others anymore, the machines do. The repetition of the no, nor, not is also a wet sign there isnt any hope in anything, we cannot see positive anymore. There is a constant anxiety in the soldiers eyes. The word choirs is also written two times. The reference in medication could be positive but here, it is not.It is a music which leads to an inevitable death. It could also refer to the heartbeat of soldiers. A worrying rhythm that could stop anytime. There is also a repetition in MCMXIV in the last stanza never (thee times). But once again, we cannot feel anger only a strong sorrow. Humans can never be innocent again after the terrible massacre of this War. Larkin accepts with resignation what happened what is done is done. The dead people will not come back. The only thing we can do is g uess them and commemorate them. On the contrary, Owen cannot tolerate this thought and he feels obliged to reach the catastrophic event harshly to prevent people to never do that again. The human loss is literally and psychologically intolerable.Finally, we can discuss about the poets choice of title of their poems. An anthem is a choral root having a sacred or moralizing text. So, this poem is aimed to all the heroes who died fighting. Nevertheless, the adjectival doomed comes to spoil the word anthem. Doomed is just mint, something inevitable. It is unbowed we cannot win over death but at least, we can stick up it as much as we can, whereas the following word youth has a tragic connotation. Young people are not supposed to die, their fate is to enjoy life as much as they can but this war comes to destroy all their dreams and hopes. MCMXIV is the number 1914 in ancient roman. We can assume it is a reference to the past, Roman letters still populate after hundreds of years, m aybe Larkin wants his poem to be remembered as much as these numbers?To conclude, we can say that even if Wilfred Owen and Philip Larkin did have different ways of approach to talk about war, they both caused very strong feelings. unrivalled used an aggressive and impulsive pen whereas the other provoked sadness and respect toward the fallen soldiers. In fact, they definitely agree in one similar point First World War was a tragedy that no one should ever forget.