'How Language Transformed Humanity Essay\r'

'The evolutionary biologist emphasize Pagel states, in his speech, that dustup is the most powerful, risky and ultra characteristic of the human being ever evolved. The conclusion of the speaker is to inform about the great and potent features of this trait. Pagel explains to us that when we talk, we are able to transfer thoughts in some ace else’s mind and vice-versa using much(prenominal) a form of telemetry. In other terminology this process is similar to what happens between TV far control and television.\r\nAccording to this biologist wrangle is one of the most subversive means that we can mapping to express ourselves. One very representative exercise is the censorship and the awareness that we have to pay worry to when we say or write anything. Going on, Mr Pagel poses devil important questions: he asks the reason why language evolves itself, and why it evolved in our species and not in others. The execute is that only human beings have a peculiar(prenomi nal) feature named â€Å"social eruditeness”, which lets us ameliorate ourselves by watching and copying the actions that someone else did.\r\n such a revolutionary characteristic could also disallow us from making the same mistakes and allows us to do the same action better than before. So we comprise progresses, whereas the smarter animals remain doing some activities over and over again, without thumping advancements. As a result of the social hireing or, as anthropologists call it, cumulative cultural fitting we can make stuff, and all the things that surround us are consequences of this process. Now we are moving towards a critical point, which is: â€Å"Why do we have language? ”.\r\nFirst, Mr. Pagel states that social learning is visual theft. We can learn detaching ideas and benefit from the best qualities of someone else, without working on something or persevering on it. secondly he reveals us that when human beings discovered this face of social l earning (thousands of years ago) arose a dilemma: â€Å"How can we preserve our best ideas and avoid that others steal them? ”. Our ancestors could have behaved in the following ways: concentrating themselves in small groups so as to bequeath the acquired tuition to offspring.\r\nBut the result would have been isolation and a slight improvement. Or they could have created a agreement of communication to start cooperating with one another and character everything useful. Obviously they had chosen the second option and in this way language was born. So the solution to the antecedent dilemma is communication. Then Mr. Pagel points out how peculiar the occurrence is that we have 8000 opposite languages spoken on Earth. more(prenominal) surprising is that the greatest density is located in the smallest areas such as islands.\r\nThis is related to the tendency of mass to isolate in small groups in ball club to protect identities and cultures. On the other side straightaw ay we communicate a lot more than in the past. But our modern world founded on connectivity and cooperation is check by the variety of languages. This raises the question: â€Å"is it possible in our globalized and standardized world to have all these different languages? ”. Mr. Pagel has no answer but it seems inevitable that our wad might be a one language world.\r\n'