English Writting Critical Response

THE CLOSING OF THE AMERICAN MIND2006Summary of Nielsen s opinion of higher education and the known school systemNeilsen criticizes present-day higher education for being analogue . He implies that disciples no get alonglong see the whole curriculum exclusively kind of , they be circumscribed to their own palm tree of choice (Nielsen 17 . This writer agrees to the consequence that colleges and universities be skilful to a greater extent and more specialized , following(a) the trends in contemporary work . How incessantly , it seems that Nielsen ( heyday ) is in like manner hasty in generalizing that because of this , students no long see the whole picture . He assumes too oftentimes without presenting any evidence other than , perhaps , in-person acknowledge . Nielsen and salad days would also presume that i t is only done the canvass of liberal arts and classic books that students raise discover the rectitude . This statement is certainly too regretful and it offers no communicate explanation of how and why they present this positionNielsen and Bloom are likewise critical of modern-day education without victorious into account the expert and attitudinal changes of that are happening everywhere in the world . They better to recognize that communication channels are almost unbounded and passel learn from one other even if they are hundreds of miles apart . They fail to mention that multitude today have more access to more literature and ideas that ever before . citizenry are no longer limited to natural libraries but they can extract terabytes of ideas and opinions through their home computer The fall by the wayside worldwide exchange of ideas is providing more learning than any physical educational institution could ever hope to provide . We are now in an age of sel f-education and traditional limited modes of! education are belatedly losing their place in some(prenominal) the academic world and outsideNielsen also criticizes the public school system for their poor level of learning and writing instruction , forcing colleges and universities to orchestrate remedial English classes (Nielsen 9 . This might be uncoiled to a certain extent but once over again , neither Neilsen nor Bloom offers a reliable source of info . They presume that just because people watch more idiot box than in the past , they are less intelligent . It is true(a) , however , that educators must recommit themselves to excel in teaching method the basics (the three R s ) correctlyWhy would Nielsen argue that students should take both arts and sciencesQuoting Bloom , the phrase says that a cracking programme for liberal education feeds the student s love of truth and estrus to live a good life (Nielsen 17 . Nielsen and Bloom believe that it is not adequacy to train people to kick the bucket excellent in their elect fields . They also pauperisation have a all-around(prenominal) education that offers pathways to the good life of wisdom and virtue (Nielsen 2 . They also criticize universities for cultivating the idea of object lesson relativism in the minds of the students (Nielsen 4 . They say that student direct their lives harmonize to principles which they find commodious and that they no longer seek for right-down truths . Student would instead seek for truths...If you want to get a full essay, smart set it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper